Hi Dan. Thank you for your response to the content i linked to.
Well, I'll agree that is one way you can look at it, and there may be some truth to it. I don't believe it's the entire truth about it. Far from. I believe they want to put some perspective one a rather one-sided debate in which most people only focus on negative stories (and they are there to be found) and forget rather many positive stories and the need in which these refugees found themselves before they got to Sweden, Germany or whereever. I think one sidedness is a sign of weaknes. I think the need to make up an event (like Trump did) is a sign of weaknes. He is the worlds most powerful man and his untrue story will affect many of the worlds weakest people. Is that fair?
I have never denied problems in Sweden or Germany and I have no problem believing your story from BBC. It does not change my view that there are other relecvant aspects to consider.
Just out of interest. You have previously claimed BBC were completely unreliable due to what the did to Cliff Richards. You wrote: "BBC will never be taken seriously after what they did to Sir Cliff. Time to move on." viewtopic.php?f=2&t=57491&start=75
For what reason did you change your mind?