Classic Petra - The Upcoming New Album.

Talk about Petra albums, songs, and concerts.
Post Reply
Boray
Pethead Fanatic
Pethead Fanatic
Posts: 752
Joined: Tue Oct 16, 2007 6:53 am
#1 Album: Beat the System
Pethead since: 1985
Location: Gothenburg, Sweden
x 3
Contact:

Re: CP-New Record

Post by Boray » Sat Feb 04, 2012 2:42 pm

executioner wrote:its really dumb to compare the two.
Why do you keep on comparing them then? Are you really dumb? Just couldn't resist to point out that you call yourself dumb.

By the way, are you into music recording and mixing? If not, then why do you ignore the comments from those here that are?
0 x

User avatar
rexreed
Pethead Fanatic
Pethead Fanatic
Posts: 979
Joined: Mon Jun 13, 2005 10:21 pm
#1 Album: Beyond Belief
Pethead since: 1991
Location: Houston
x 36

Re: CP-New Record

Post by rexreed » Mon Feb 06, 2012 12:19 am

Boray wrote:
executioner wrote:its really dumb to compare the two.
Why do you keep on comparing them then? Are you really dumb? Just couldn't resist to point out that you call yourself dumb.

By the way, are you into music recording and mixing? If not, then why do you ignore the comments from those here that are?
If someone is responding to a statement then they are not ignoring it. Do I need to bring my Petra recordings to a recording studio and have the engineer rip the early albums to pieces ? You don't even have to compare Petra to other bands. Listen to WUC and compare it to BTTS- just a few years difference and most folks, I would argue, think the WUC has a higher production values. I've said many times that I do not care for that album's music, but it does sound fantastic. From what I have heard, Star Song was pretty darned cheap and it would seem highly unlikely that a band like Petra would be able to spend the same kind of money on an album as Journey or Foreigner in 1981. Does more money + better album? well not exactly but it stands to reason that more money +more resources and that would lend itself to a better production. If it offends you when people say this then I do not know what to tell you- it actually means that Petra improved.
0 x

User avatar
p-freak
Pethead Fanatic
Pethead Fanatic
Posts: 1549
Joined: Thu Oct 02, 2003 10:01 am
#1 Album: Unseen Power
Pethead since: 1992
Location: The Netherlands
x 68
Contact:

Re: CP-New Record

Post by p-freak » Mon Feb 06, 2012 5:27 am

I don't know anything about recording music and I'm not an audiophile. When I listen to Petra's albums, I think only the production quality for Back To The Street is really bad. It's an album I hardly listen to because everything sounds so muffled. To a certain extent TMW has the same problem, but it's already quite a bit better than BTTS. I think the JDB albums and Wake-Up Call sound much cleaner and better than anything the Elefantes ever did, maybe with the exception of PP2 and God Fixation. But a big problem is also the mastering. The remastered songs on Still Means War! sounds so much better than the original masters. I wonder if a true remastering of the JDB albums would work such a miracle as well.
0 x
Image

Boray
Pethead Fanatic
Pethead Fanatic
Posts: 752
Joined: Tue Oct 16, 2007 6:53 am
#1 Album: Beat the System
Pethead since: 1985
Location: Gothenburg, Sweden
x 3
Contact:

Re: CP-New Record

Post by Boray » Mon Feb 06, 2012 6:27 am

I'm not particularly offended, but maybe I should be when someone just called all people in this thread for "really dumb".

I don't consider Back to the Street to be an "early" Petra record. It was their 9'th album! But I don't have a problem with the sound of it either. It's very typical for it's time and production wise actually sounds a lot better than the Elephante Kansas albums.

One album ahead of it's time was Beat the system. I've amused myself by playing the title track for friends and asked what year they think it is. They usually say some year in the 90's! I guess it sounds like some 90's techno pop with the off beat bass line.
0 x

executioner
Extreme Pethead Fanatic
Extreme Pethead Fanatic
Posts: 3947
Joined: Thu Oct 02, 2003 10:56 am
#1 Album: JAH
Pethead since: 1980
Location: Earth
x 55

Re: CP-New Record

Post by executioner » Mon Feb 06, 2012 10:50 am

Boray wrote:I'm not particularly offended, but maybe I should be when someone just called all people in this thread for "really dumb".

I don't consider Back to the Street to be an "early" Petra record. It was their 9'th album! But I don't have a problem with the sound of it either. It's very typical for it's time and production wise actually sounds a lot better than the Elephante Kansas albums.

One album ahead of it's time was Beat the system. I've amused myself by playing the title track for friends and asked what year they think it is. They usually say some year in the 90's! I guess it sounds like some 90's techno pop with the off beat bass line.
Well after thinking about it and putting multiple of these artists side by side and listening to them for the last week I've come to the conclusion that it really was dumb(including me) to compare Petra's recordings to their secular counterparts. This also includes "The Dream Team" albums that were produced by John & Dino.
I really think Petra's quality didn't start getting in the same realm as their secular buddies until WUC, PP2, GF, DT, & JAH; the 2 misteps being No Doubt & Revival.

Now you and others can be offended, but when it comes right down to it its just my opinion and in the grand scheme of things none of our opinions really don't mean much.
0 x
FORGIVE! FORGET! & LET GO!

User avatar
Jonathan
Official Petrazone Spokesman.
Official Petrazone Spokesman.
Posts: 1839
Joined: Fri Oct 17, 2003 5:04 am
#1 Album: More Power To Ya
Pethead since: 1991
Location: Michigansk, U.S.S.A
x 16
Contact:

Re: CP-New Record

Post by Jonathan » Mon Feb 06, 2012 11:35 am

Image
0 x
"...We bent our backs and pulled the oars to the beat of Louie's solo..."

User avatar
rexreed
Pethead Fanatic
Pethead Fanatic
Posts: 979
Joined: Mon Jun 13, 2005 10:21 pm
#1 Album: Beyond Belief
Pethead since: 1991
Location: Houston
x 36

Re: CP-New Record

Post by rexreed » Mon Feb 06, 2012 11:58 am

executioner wrote:
Boray wrote:I'm not particularly offended, but maybe I should be when someone just called all people in this thread for "really dumb".

....



Now you and others can be offended, but when it comes right down to it its just my opinion and in the grand scheme of things none of our opinions really don't mean much.
So you are saying that our opinions do mean much? :wink:
0 x

Boray
Pethead Fanatic
Pethead Fanatic
Posts: 752
Joined: Tue Oct 16, 2007 6:53 am
#1 Album: Beat the System
Pethead since: 1985
Location: Gothenburg, Sweden
x 3
Contact:

Re: CP-New Record

Post by Boray » Mon Feb 06, 2012 12:08 pm

I don't think it's dumb to compare things. What's dumb is to confuse production quality for musical style and preference. If you want your music to sound like it's all compressed into your own head - then there you go, there is Jekyll&Hyde for you. But if you for example prefer a more natural dynamic sounding rock band or a rock/pop album, then ending up with a Jekyll&Hyde sound would be a total failure as a production, regardless of if some dude out there like the sound or not.
0 x

executioner
Extreme Pethead Fanatic
Extreme Pethead Fanatic
Posts: 3947
Joined: Thu Oct 02, 2003 10:56 am
#1 Album: JAH
Pethead since: 1980
Location: Earth
x 55

Re: CP-New Record

Post by executioner » Mon Feb 06, 2012 1:10 pm

rexreed wrote:
executioner wrote:
Boray wrote:I'm not particularly offended, but maybe I should be when someone just called all people in this thread for "really dumb".

....



Now you and others can be offended, but when it comes right down to it its just my opinion and in the grand scheme of things none of our opinions really don't mean much.
So you are saying that our opinions do mean much? :wink:
On a personal level and us discussing a subject here yeah it means a lot, but in the grand schemes of all this do you think that they are taking any of our advices or opinions personally? No their not, so why should we?
0 x
FORGIVE! FORGET! & LET GO!

executioner
Extreme Pethead Fanatic
Extreme Pethead Fanatic
Posts: 3947
Joined: Thu Oct 02, 2003 10:56 am
#1 Album: JAH
Pethead since: 1980
Location: Earth
x 55

Re: CP-New Record

Post by executioner » Mon Feb 06, 2012 1:46 pm

Boray wrote:I don't think it's dumb to compare things. What's dumb is to confuse production quality for musical style and preference. If you want your music to sound like it's all compressed into your own head - then there you go, there is Jekyll&Hyde for you. But if you for example prefer a more natural dynamic sounding rock band or a rock/pop album, then ending up with a Jekyll&Hyde sound would be a total failure as a production, regardless of if some dude out there like the sound or not.
Well I'm not the one confusing production quality with music style and preference. It's like comparing Lexus/Kia or a movie with a budget of $100 million versus a movie with a budget of $1million; they both will have great actors/musicians and substance, but after that the quality of production is all about the money. JDB did great work with the funding he had. Mutt Lange, Rick Rubin, or Bob Rock could not have done any better.

Like I said earlier this is just my opinion and let's just agree to disagree and move on.
0 x
FORGIVE! FORGET! & LET GO!

Boray
Pethead Fanatic
Pethead Fanatic
Posts: 752
Joined: Tue Oct 16, 2007 6:53 am
#1 Album: Beat the System
Pethead since: 1985
Location: Gothenburg, Sweden
x 3
Contact:

Re: CP-New Record

Post by Boray » Mon Feb 06, 2012 2:20 pm

executioner wrote:Like I said earlier this is just my opinion and let's just agree to disagree and move on.
Ok
0 x

User avatar
Mountain Man
Pethead Fanatic
Pethead Fanatic
Posts: 1427
Joined: Fri Oct 10, 2003 9:11 pm
#1 Album: Wake-Up Call
Pethead since: 1983
x 272

Re: CP-New Record

Post by Mountain Man » Tue Feb 07, 2012 12:45 pm

executioner wrote:No there are no facts here just opinions...
Incorrect. The fact is that objectively speaking, early Petra albums are the same overall quality as other artists of the day.

That you prefer certain stylistic choices over those employed by early Petra is based on opinion.
0 x

DeSoto
Pethead
Pethead
Posts: 78
Joined: Sun Nov 21, 2010 6:45 am

Re: CP-New Record

Post by DeSoto » Tue Feb 07, 2012 1:14 pm

Now we know it:
Work has begun in earnest on the first album of original material from Classic Petra. With a planned 10 new songs + new versions of two classic tracks, it's the line-up's first album of 'new' songs since 'Beat The System'. Stand by for additional updates....and there will be plenty! (admin)

facebook...
0 x

executioner
Extreme Pethead Fanatic
Extreme Pethead Fanatic
Posts: 3947
Joined: Thu Oct 02, 2003 10:56 am
#1 Album: JAH
Pethead since: 1980
Location: Earth
x 55

Re: CP-New Record

Post by executioner » Tue Feb 07, 2012 1:25 pm

Mountain Man wrote:
executioner wrote:No there are no facts here just opinions...
Incorrect. The fact is that objectively speaking, early Petra albums are the same overall quality as other artists of the day.

That you prefer certain stylistic choices over those employed by early Petra is based on opinion.
Like I said that's your opinion not mine.

Why don't we enjoy the news we are seeing about a new album, and for the final time agree to disagree and move on.
0 x
FORGIVE! FORGET! & LET GO!

adpetrafan
Pethead
Pethead
Posts: 202
Joined: Sat Sep 25, 2010 11:05 am
x 7

Re: CP-New Record

Post by adpetrafan » Tue Feb 07, 2012 2:14 pm

DeSoto wrote:Now we know it:
Work has begun in earnest on the first album of original material from Classic Petra. With a planned 10 new songs + new versions of two classic tracks, it's the line-up's first album of 'new' songs since 'Beat The System'. Stand by for additional updates....and there will be plenty! (admin)

facebook...
=)

I posted the news in a new thread since this one is so hopelessly derailed.

;-)
0 x

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 47 guests