Page 1 of 1
More pix on jws.com
Posted: Tue Oct 11, 2005 4:20 pm
by sue d.
These are courtesy of Bridget (calicowriter)
http://www.johnwschlitt.com/PicPages/05 ... linTN2.htm
She does a really nice job - AND she shoots film!!!
(maybe we can turn CITS/CITAS debate! (no... NO!)
HTT
Posted: Wed Oct 12, 2005 8:23 am
by Michael
Didn't ANYBODY shoot a head-to-toe of John in action? SHEESH!
Posted: Wed Oct 12, 2005 8:46 am
by Mexican Spud
Posted: Wed Oct 12, 2005 11:21 am
by sue d.
I have plenty of head to NOSE shots of John! lol!
I have to look thru all my pix (or look on the site - they're all loaded there).
I usually go for the head shot, not the full-length one. I have a few.... but then you can't really see his face. We may have to re-think the photo.
Posted: Wed Oct 12, 2005 11:21 am
by rdywlngndabl
Yeah, anything I took of John would have been like right up his nostrils. Front row isn't best for photos. LOL...
Besides, it's hard to get any kind of good photos with no flash
head-to-toe
Posted: Wed Oct 12, 2005 12:38 pm
by Michael
But any film-shot pictures could be rescanned in an extremely high resolution, and they would work in a much-enlarged and re-cropped form for Web. Ones shot with digital cameras might not be able to be lown up that much. Score one for film cameras.
Posted: Thu Oct 13, 2005 9:49 am
by rdywlngndabl
Not really... Digital cameras generally take pictures at ridiculously high resolution (like 2300x1800 or whatever the ratio is), and then you have to shrink them down just to make them manageable.
