Post
by brent » Mon Mar 14, 2011 5:15 pm
There was nothing negative there. I laid out how Petra fans could put Petra on top of those charts and ensure that the site stay afloat to play those charts for one month. They need about 5k a month to keep going. Petra fans would make a real impact, and that would be newsworthy.
As far as site traffic is concerned, there is no way to conceal the truth. You and industry people have access to reporting sites that tell how much traffic and money is generated by any site. If a band is getting great reviews, but the site has two viewers, that does not hold as much cred as CCM, HM, CMS, etc, etc, etc. If a site only has 100 listeners on average, you have the information necessary to dominate the site.
This is all positive...maybe except for the fact that less than 100 people listen. But, there are some terrestrial radio stations that would love to have those numbers. In the old days, when there were less choices, it was easier to get exposure to more people with less frequency and cash. Now there are more places for people to read, listen, watch, etc, and so the market is fragmented.
Here is something newsworthy, there weren't that many artists that sold more than 10,000 copies of CDs last year. The median for big sellers was 40k units. So, every artist, every website, every station has less market share than what they had two years ago. The flip side is, there is now a diminishing ROI for large budget productions. This will force everyone to get more competitive and possibly provide better music for the money.
The days of bands being huge are over. These are the days of being lean and mean, grassroots, and cutting edge. This gives Petra a chance to survive. They have good brains behind them. They have some connections. ==Sorry if you see this as negative. It isn't.
0 x