SB 1070

A place for Petra fans to discuss other topics
executioner
Extreme Pethead Fanatic
Extreme Pethead Fanatic
Posts: 3947
Joined: Thu Oct 02, 2003 10:56 am
#1 Album: JAH
Pethead since: 1980
Location: Earth
x 55

Re: SB 1070

Post by executioner » Wed Aug 04, 2010 8:15 am

Daniel wrote:
executioner wrote:
Daniel wrote:
executioner wrote:
Daniel wrote:I live in Arizona legally. If you got here jumping the fence or what ever go home. We respect the law here.

Paper work is no excuse for not following the law.

This State is over run by people laughing in the face of the law, getting emergency health care and never getting a bill. Has nothing to do with race.. what a load of rubbish.

My wife is Latino, and we both support the new law fully..

Bloody Obama
Pray about it and think and feel Christian first and citizen second and I will tell you your heart will change.
Ah yes yet another who hasn't even read the bill but decides to denounce it.

How dare you tell anyone to think & feel Christian. Now you read the bill and pray brother.
I dared and I did and I will do it again. I've actually read enough of the bill to know that's its laughable in places because most police departments in your great state have denounced it saying they will not let their officers be subjected to it. The bill was not thought out at all. It will end up costing your state so much revenue and actually will bankrupt beyond means.

Now I will tell you I don't give flying flip about that bill. All I care about is showing these people the Love of Christ, and if that bill gets in the way of doing that, then that bill is getting in the way of God.
What do you mean "these people" your treading shaky ground here.
Naw standing on firm ground here. The law will never see the light of day; their getting into Federal terrority here. Major changes like Virginia has done will be its only hope. Another problem is the funding for this; The state doesn't have the funding here to help the local police with the funding. The city of Tuscan has asked for 3M a year in funding for this, and the state basically has said your on your own.
If it does passed and get inacted your state will go bankrupt trying to inforce this alone. Most economists have said the funding for this is not there, and the state needs to rethink their cause.
0 x
FORGIVE! FORGET! & LET GO!

executioner
Extreme Pethead Fanatic
Extreme Pethead Fanatic
Posts: 3947
Joined: Thu Oct 02, 2003 10:56 am
#1 Album: JAH
Pethead since: 1980
Location: Earth
x 55

Re: SB 1070

Post by executioner » Wed Aug 04, 2010 8:29 am

Daniel wrote:executioner (is that some reference to capital punishment?) you need to now look up federal law, tell me do you find this funny too?
not following what your saying here.


BTW Daniel as of right now its NOT a felony to enter the country illegally. The only way its a felony is if the person trying to enter the country is officially on the terrorist watch list.

1. first 2 offenses(trying to enter) is a misdemeaner and max. $500 fine with NO provisions to be detained or deported. They can not be deported until the third offense.
0 x
FORGIVE! FORGET! & LET GO!

executioner
Extreme Pethead Fanatic
Extreme Pethead Fanatic
Posts: 3947
Joined: Thu Oct 02, 2003 10:56 am
#1 Album: JAH
Pethead since: 1980
Location: Earth
x 55

Re: SB 1070

Post by executioner » Wed Aug 04, 2010 8:38 am

corolla1 wrote:
executioner wrote:
CatNamedManny wrote:
brent wrote:
Less than 50 percent of the US citizens pay taxes.


Untrue. 47 percent of U.S. households did not owe federal income taxes; however, all people purchasing goods in the United States pay state sales taxes, never mind local sales taxes and state and local income taxes and other federal taxes (such as payroll tax). The percentage of U.S. citizens who pay any kind of federal taxes is 90 percent. [Source: http://www.nytimes.com/2010/04/14/busin ... hardt.html]
Over 50 percent are on US government and/or state assistance programs
.

Not quite. In the third quarter of 2008, the peak of the financial crisis, 45 percent of U.S. households had at least one member receiving government benefits. That means the actual overall percentage of American citizens is a good deal lower. [Source: http://www.census.gov/prod/2010pubs/p70-119.pdf]
Our economy is failing. Our health care system is taxed. We just can't take any more people, especially if they have no regard for the laws of our land.


Even accepting the first two statements (I would actually reverse the verbs: our economy is taxed; our health-care system is failing), it's quite the non sequitur to argue, "We just can't take any more people." Won't those people pay taxes that will provide more revenue for the government? Won't they buy things, injecting more money into the economy? "Especially if they have no regard for the laws of our land." This is true on its face; they're breaking a law by not entering legally; but, again, data show illegal immigrants do not commit crimes at rates any higher than would be expected for a group of people of their class and income levels born and bed in the U.S. [Source: http://boston.com/community/blogs/crime ... ver_i.html]
This is not an anti-Mexican policy. You are blowing this out of proportion. There are about 12 million of you people over here illegally.
First, it was down to 11 million in 2008, down from 12.5 million in 2007, so I wouldn't be surprised if we're down below 10 million now. Less than 6 million are from Mexico. No one really talks about the other 5 million though. Roughly 1 million are from Asia. Yet I don't hear a lot about keeping all those Asians... [source:http://pewhispanic.org/files/reports/61.pdf]
There is a large population committing crimes. We have drugs coming in from Mexico. We have baby trafficing from Mexico. We have convicted felons, guilty of killing people while driving vehicles while drunk, when they had no license to drive or authority to be in this country to begin with.
Anecdotes are fun, but they're no substitute for facts, and the facts show that while, yes, illegal immigrants commit crimes, so do legal immigrants, and so do U.S. citizens, and if you take an illegal immigrant, a legal immigrant and a U.S. citizen, all from the same income level and socioeconomic background, there is no difference between each one's likelihood to commit a crime. [see above]
Instead of blaming us for wanting to protect our legal citizens from your corrupted, law-breaking, illegal aliens, then fix YOUR country.
Repeating the same incorrect stereotypes does not make them any less incorrect. No one doubts Mexico needs to be fixed. But you know what's fueling the drug-and-guns crisis in Mexico? American guns and American appetite for illegal drugs. The Mexican drug trade is decimated the minute we legalize marijuana in the States. It's not just a Mexican problem.
Our Constitution binds our government to protect us, and the government is not willing to do it. So the states are going to have their fill, and voters are going to oust this nut job Obama and his whacko regime...I HOPE.
Well, as long as we're rational about it. The Obama administration has increased deportations by 10 percent over the Bush administration. Illegal border crossings are one-third the levels they were a decade ago, and it's estimated two-thirds of all attempted crossers are detained at the border. The idea that the border is this lawless outpost, with violence and beheadings and zero enforcement is patently, blatantly, laughably false. [Source: http://www.npr.org/templates/story/stor ... =126887021]
Look, what if Russia started to invade your country with a few million people a year, until it took food out of your mouth, teachers away from your students, and then your country decided to make you speak Russian as a secondary language? What if your doctors were tied up helping the Russians in your hospitals, while you, a natural citizen, had to wait. Imagine you having to give up more of what YOU earn, to pay for someone else to live in a prison, for a murder that could of been avoided had that Russian stayed in Russia.
Ooooh, the Russians! So much scarier than the Mexicans! Look, it's not "a few million people a year." It's more like 250,000. And why do they do it? Not to sell drugs or rape women or kill babies. Because their average wage increases from $2.30 to $8.50 per hour once they cross the Rio Grande. The question of their effect on American workers is much more complicated than either side would try to make it out to be. Yes, the wages of low-income American workers are reduced by immigrants, both legal and illegal, willing to work for dirt cheap. On the other hand, the increased productivity and profits those immigrants provide lead to lower costs for the goods and services they produce, therefore increasing the spending power of all residents who live in high-immigration areas. As for using American social services, these immigrants also pay taxes -- sales taxes, gas taxes, payroll taxes, etc. -- the benefits of which they will not receive to the degree U.S. citizens do. Studies indicate this offsets the benefits they receive, and the overall net cost to their U.S.-born neighbors is zero. [Source: http://www.cfr.org/content/publications ... nCSR26.pdf]
If I were you, I would be investigating the EU, the NWO and other organizations that view your country as a drain on the global community. They want to get rid of your country, and consolidate it. There are dark powers at play to take your country down, and it is not the USA. If anyone has given you guys the "get out of jail free card", it is the USA.
Yes, of all the countries in the world causing problems, including its own member countries of Greece, Spain, Portugal and Iceland, the EU is worried about taking down Mexico. That makes soooo much sense. How would they take it down? Coup? Assassination? Nuclear holocaust? Drive it into bankruptcy, foreclose and sell the land to Warren Buffet? Sorry, I'm a little slow to buy the "dark powers" argument.
You are listening to the mainstream press, which is all BULLCRAP. They say what the government wants them to say.
This is the point at which I realized once and for all that I just wasted my time reading everything before and after that. As a former member of the mainstream press, let me tell you: There is no vast conspiracy, no taking marching orders from the government, no big cabal out to lead the big Obamarevolution to take away all the rights and freedoms of the hard-working Americans. ... But then I would say that, wouldn't I? Mwahahaha.
We have had border patrols, hired, trained and then put in prison for doing their job. If you think there is a major resistance, think again. We must be the only country that prosecutes it's one employees for doing their own job, protecting the citizens
I'm pretty sure their job description didn't involve shooting unarmed people who are running away from them and then covering it up, which is what those agents were convicted of doing, by a jury of their peers, in a court of law. [Source: http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,244193,00.html]
If you cannot afford to come to the US, pay your way, get a job, assume our identity and our culture, forsaking your own, then the USA does not want you.
The United States has never required that legal immigrants forsake their own culture. Assimilation is not a requirement for citizenship, nor should it be. The federal government should have no role in telling its citizens what language to speak, what religious customs to observe (with certain exceptions), how to dress (with certain exceptions) or what culture to maintain in their home.
That is where the majority of us are at right now.
Gosh, I hope not.
We do not want to be a Muslim nation.


Good. Because we're not, and we won't be. Just like we're not, have never been and shouldn't ever be a Christian nation. We are a nation that has no official religion and provides the freedom for people of all faiths to practice that faith when, where and how they see fit, providing the exercise of that faith does not infringe on the rights of others to practice their faith.
We do not want to be anything else. We are about full. We are running out of land, roads, food, fuel, money, etc. It is time to lock the doors and tell other nations to get off of their asses and do for themselves for a while. Sometimes teaching people to fish is better than continuing to catch the fish for them while they do nothing. Tough love baby!
None of this is remotely true, nor wise, nor particularly useful to the discussion.
BTW, The law stated that the Mexicans would be expelled only if they were found guilty of being here illegally. Legal aliens stay.
Unless they left their papers at home. Or unless they're U.S. citizens out for a stroll without their wallet, and whoops! They're a little too "shady looking" for the police officer's taste, and now they're in a holding cell waiting for someone to bring their driver's license, which as we all know can be forged, to the station.
Why are YOU AGAINST FOLLOWING THE LAWS?
Interesting that many police chiefs in Arizona were also opposed to this law. Were they also "AGAINST FOLLOWING THE LAWS?!" Or were they merely concerned that a law like this would destroy the trust between Hispanics and the police, which is key to arresting actually dangerous people, and noticing that the one county that makes it a point to focus heavily on illegal immigration has actually seen a sharp increase in violent crime as resources are diverted from preventing it? [Source: http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE64P58T20100526]
If these law breakers don't want to do it our way, it's too bad for them. Living here is not a RIGHT. It is something we earn and contribute to...under the law.
All this is true, as far as it goes. Someone who enters the country illegally takes the risk that he or she will be discovered and potentially deported. They obviously don't have a right to be here, but they're still willing to try because of the desperation they feel across the border. We can type in all caps and rant and rave about law and order all we want; that will help exactly zero people, will go exactly none of the way toward solving the problem, and will do a whole heck of a lot to turn people off to the faith we're supposed to be offering to them, regardless of their nation of origin or the legal status of their residency.
I respect all the opinions on here and I'm agreeing with what Manny is saying here. I feel its time we start looking at this matter as a Christian first and an American second. It's time our hearts change for these people and really show them what we as Christians are really made of.

Does showing the world what kind of Chrisitians we are include encouraging law breaking? I don't think God will be pleased. I'm not attacking you BTW, I say this with respect.
I and my church do not support anyone breaking the law. When we get in contact with illegals the first thing we do is get in touch with ICE and get their fine paid; 2nd thing we do is go through the IRS and get thier ITIN number set up so they can pay their taxes. Its really a great God Ordained ministry that is bringing countless amount of people to Christ. Our church has actually started a spanish church where some of them go and worship. Our church comes in contact with about 1,000-1,200 new illegals a month and most come to know Christ in a personal way and also get going on getting their legal status repaired through the proper govenment channels.

LET ME ASK YOU WHAT IS YOUR CHURCH OR YOU ON A PERSONAL BASIS DOING?
0 x
FORGIVE! FORGET! & LET GO!

User avatar
Dan
Pethead Fanatic
Pethead Fanatic
Posts: 2556
Joined: Thu Oct 09, 2003 4:17 am
#1 Album: This Means War!
Pethead since: 1987
Location: USA
x 82

Re: SB 1070

Post by Dan » Wed Aug 04, 2010 10:13 am

executioner wrote:
Daniel wrote:executioner (is that some reference to capital punishment?) you need to now look up federal law, tell me do you find this funny too?
not following what your saying here.


BTW Daniel as of right now its NOT a felony to enter the country illegally. The only way its a felony is if the person trying to enter the country is officially on the terrorist watch list.

1. first 2 offenses(trying to enter) is a misdemeaner and max. $500 fine with NO provisions to be detained or deported. They can not be deported until the third offense.
Do a google image search for your name Executioner:
Image


Felony was the wrong word, and misdemeanor is breaking the law so it was just the wrong word, still criminal.

Enough bold for you.
0 x

User avatar
Dan
Pethead Fanatic
Pethead Fanatic
Posts: 2556
Joined: Thu Oct 09, 2003 4:17 am
#1 Album: This Means War!
Pethead since: 1987
Location: USA
x 82

Re: SB 1070

Post by Dan » Wed Aug 04, 2010 10:24 am

executioner wrote:
corolla1 wrote:
executioner wrote:
CatNamedManny wrote:
brent wrote:
Less than 50 percent of the US citizens pay taxes.


Untrue. 47 percent of U.S. households did not owe federal income taxes; however, all people purchasing goods in the United States pay state sales taxes, never mind local sales taxes and state and local income taxes and other federal taxes (such as payroll tax). The percentage of U.S. citizens who pay any kind of federal taxes is 90 percent. [Source: http://www.nytimes.com/2010/04/14/busin ... hardt.html]
Over 50 percent are on US government and/or state assistance programs
.

Not quite. In the third quarter of 2008, the peak of the financial crisis, 45 percent of U.S. households had at least one member receiving government benefits. That means the actual overall percentage of American citizens is a good deal lower. [Source: http://www.census.gov/prod/2010pubs/p70-119.pdf]
Our economy is failing. Our health care system is taxed. We just can't take any more people, especially if they have no regard for the laws of our land.


Even accepting the first two statements (I would actually reverse the verbs: our economy is taxed; our health-care system is failing), it's quite the non sequitur to argue, "We just can't take any more people." Won't those people pay taxes that will provide more revenue for the government? Won't they buy things, injecting more money into the economy? "Especially if they have no regard for the laws of our land." This is true on its face; they're breaking a law by not entering legally; but, again, data show illegal immigrants do not commit crimes at rates any higher than would be expected for a group of people of their class and income levels born and bed in the U.S. [Source: http://boston.com/community/blogs/crime ... ver_i.html]
This is not an anti-Mexican policy. You are blowing this out of proportion. There are about 12 million of you people over here illegally.
First, it was down to 11 million in 2008, down from 12.5 million in 2007, so I wouldn't be surprised if we're down below 10 million now. Less than 6 million are from Mexico. No one really talks about the other 5 million though. Roughly 1 million are from Asia. Yet I don't hear a lot about keeping all those Asians... [source:http://pewhispanic.org/files/reports/61.pdf]
There is a large population committing crimes. We have drugs coming in from Mexico. We have baby trafficing from Mexico. We have convicted felons, guilty of killing people while driving vehicles while drunk, when they had no license to drive or authority to be in this country to begin with.
Anecdotes are fun, but they're no substitute for facts, and the facts show that while, yes, illegal immigrants commit crimes, so do legal immigrants, and so do U.S. citizens, and if you take an illegal immigrant, a legal immigrant and a U.S. citizen, all from the same income level and socioeconomic background, there is no difference between each one's likelihood to commit a crime. [see above]
Instead of blaming us for wanting to protect our legal citizens from your corrupted, law-breaking, illegal aliens, then fix YOUR country.
Repeating the same incorrect stereotypes does not make them any less incorrect. No one doubts Mexico needs to be fixed. But you know what's fueling the drug-and-guns crisis in Mexico? American guns and American appetite for illegal drugs. The Mexican drug trade is decimated the minute we legalize marijuana in the States. It's not just a Mexican problem.
Our Constitution binds our government to protect us, and the government is not willing to do it. So the states are going to have their fill, and voters are going to oust this nut job Obama and his whacko regime...I HOPE.
Well, as long as we're rational about it. The Obama administration has increased deportations by 10 percent over the Bush administration. Illegal border crossings are one-third the levels they were a decade ago, and it's estimated two-thirds of all attempted crossers are detained at the border. The idea that the border is this lawless outpost, with violence and beheadings and zero enforcement is patently, blatantly, laughably false. [Source: http://www.npr.org/templates/story/stor ... =126887021]
Look, what if Russia started to invade your country with a few million people a year, until it took food out of your mouth, teachers away from your students, and then your country decided to make you speak Russian as a secondary language? What if your doctors were tied up helping the Russians in your hospitals, while you, a natural citizen, had to wait. Imagine you having to give up more of what YOU earn, to pay for someone else to live in a prison, for a murder that could of been avoided had that Russian stayed in Russia.
Ooooh, the Russians! So much scarier than the Mexicans! Look, it's not "a few million people a year." It's more like 250,000. And why do they do it? Not to sell drugs or rape women or kill babies. Because their average wage increases from $2.30 to $8.50 per hour once they cross the Rio Grande. The question of their effect on American workers is much more complicated than either side would try to make it out to be. Yes, the wages of low-income American workers are reduced by immigrants, both legal and illegal, willing to work for dirt cheap. On the other hand, the increased productivity and profits those immigrants provide lead to lower costs for the goods and services they produce, therefore increasing the spending power of all residents who live in high-immigration areas. As for using American social services, these immigrants also pay taxes -- sales taxes, gas taxes, payroll taxes, etc. -- the benefits of which they will not receive to the degree U.S. citizens do. Studies indicate this offsets the benefits they receive, and the overall net cost to their U.S.-born neighbors is zero. [Source: http://www.cfr.org/content/publications ... nCSR26.pdf]
If I were you, I would be investigating the EU, the NWO and other organizations that view your country as a drain on the global community. They want to get rid of your country, and consolidate it. There are dark powers at play to take your country down, and it is not the USA. If anyone has given you guys the "get out of jail free card", it is the USA.
Yes, of all the countries in the world causing problems, including its own member countries of Greece, Spain, Portugal and Iceland, the EU is worried about taking down Mexico. That makes soooo much sense. How would they take it down? Coup? Assassination? Nuclear holocaust? Drive it into bankruptcy, foreclose and sell the land to Warren Buffet? Sorry, I'm a little slow to buy the "dark powers" argument.
You are listening to the mainstream press, which is all BULLCRAP. They say what the government wants them to say.
This is the point at which I realized once and for all that I just wasted my time reading everything before and after that. As a former member of the mainstream press, let me tell you: There is no vast conspiracy, no taking marching orders from the government, no big cabal out to lead the big Obamarevolution to take away all the rights and freedoms of the hard-working Americans. ... But then I would say that, wouldn't I? Mwahahaha.
We have had border patrols, hired, trained and then put in prison for doing their job. If you think there is a major resistance, think again. We must be the only country that prosecutes it's one employees for doing their own job, protecting the citizens
I'm pretty sure their job description didn't involve shooting unarmed people who are running away from them and then covering it up, which is what those agents were convicted of doing, by a jury of their peers, in a court of law. [Source: http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,244193,00.html]
If you cannot afford to come to the US, pay your way, get a job, assume our identity and our culture, forsaking your own, then the USA does not want you.
The United States has never required that legal immigrants forsake their own culture. Assimilation is not a requirement for citizenship, nor should it be. The federal government should have no role in telling its citizens what language to speak, what religious customs to observe (with certain exceptions), how to dress (with certain exceptions) or what culture to maintain in their home.
That is where the majority of us are at right now.
Gosh, I hope not.
We do not want to be a Muslim nation.


Good. Because we're not, and we won't be. Just like we're not, have never been and shouldn't ever be a Christian nation. We are a nation that has no official religion and provides the freedom for people of all faiths to practice that faith when, where and how they see fit, providing the exercise of that faith does not infringe on the rights of others to practice their faith.
We do not want to be anything else. We are about full. We are running out of land, roads, food, fuel, money, etc. It is time to lock the doors and tell other nations to get off of their asses and do for themselves for a while. Sometimes teaching people to fish is better than continuing to catch the fish for them while they do nothing. Tough love baby!
None of this is remotely true, nor wise, nor particularly useful to the discussion.
BTW, The law stated that the Mexicans would be expelled only if they were found guilty of being here illegally. Legal aliens stay.
Unless they left their papers at home. Or unless they're U.S. citizens out for a stroll without their wallet, and whoops! They're a little too "shady looking" for the police officer's taste, and now they're in a holding cell waiting for someone to bring their driver's license, which as we all know can be forged, to the station.
Why are YOU AGAINST FOLLOWING THE LAWS?
Interesting that many police chiefs in Arizona were also opposed to this law. Were they also "AGAINST FOLLOWING THE LAWS?!" Or were they merely concerned that a law like this would destroy the trust between Hispanics and the police, which is key to arresting actually dangerous people, and noticing that the one county that makes it a point to focus heavily on illegal immigration has actually seen a sharp increase in violent crime as resources are diverted from preventing it? [Source: http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE64P58T20100526]
If these law breakers don't want to do it our way, it's too bad for them. Living here is not a RIGHT. It is something we earn and contribute to...under the law.
All this is true, as far as it goes. Someone who enters the country illegally takes the risk that he or she will be discovered and potentially deported. They obviously don't have a right to be here, but they're still willing to try because of the desperation they feel across the border. We can type in all caps and rant and rave about law and order all we want; that will help exactly zero people, will go exactly none of the way toward solving the problem, and will do a whole heck of a lot to turn people off to the faith we're supposed to be offering to them, regardless of their nation of origin or the legal status of their residency.
I respect all the opinions on here and I'm agreeing with what Manny is saying here. I feel its time we start looking at this matter as a Christian first and an American second. It's time our hearts change for these people and really show them what we as Christians are really made of.

Does showing the world what kind of Chrisitians we are include encouraging law breaking? I don't think God will be pleased. I'm not attacking you BTW, I say this with respect.
I and my church do not support anyone breaking the law. When we get in contact with illegals the first thing we do is get in touch with ICE and get their fine paid; 2nd thing we do is go through the IRS and get thier ITIN number set up so they can pay their taxes. Its really a great God Ordained ministry that is bringing countless amount of people to Christ. Our church has actually started a spanish church where some of them go and worship. Our church comes in contact with about 1,000-1,200 new illegals a month and most come to know Christ in a personal way and also get going on getting their legal status repaired through the proper govenment channels.

LET ME ASK YOU WHAT IS YOUR CHURCH OR YOU ON A PERSONAL BASIS DOING?

Your church and it's people are breaking the law by harboring illegal activity.
1000-1200 illegals a month and most come to know Christ? oh please what an abuse of the Church.

14,000 Illegals a year at your church



What my Church is doing, is not encouraging law breakers.
0 x

User avatar
Dan
Pethead Fanatic
Pethead Fanatic
Posts: 2556
Joined: Thu Oct 09, 2003 4:17 am
#1 Album: This Means War!
Pethead since: 1987
Location: USA
x 82

Re: SB 1070

Post by Dan » Wed Aug 04, 2010 10:45 am



The whole idea of the boarder security is a joke, surely now you can see why it needs enforcing...
0 x

User avatar
Dan
Pethead Fanatic
Pethead Fanatic
Posts: 2556
Joined: Thu Oct 09, 2003 4:17 am
#1 Album: This Means War!
Pethead since: 1987
Location: USA
x 82

Re: SB 1070

Post by Dan » Wed Aug 04, 2010 1:33 pm

Shouldn't be long now.... :roll:
Image
0 x

CatNamedManny
Pethead Wikipedia Warrior
Pethead Wikipedia Warrior
Posts: 429
Joined: Wed May 05, 2010 3:28 pm
#1 Album: On Fire!
Pethead since: 1996
x 1

Re: SB 1070

Post by CatNamedManny » Wed Aug 04, 2010 1:49 pm

Is the federal government not doing its job? All the numbers indicate its doing its job better than it ever has (I posted those numbers and the sources. No one has posted anything rebutting them). Proponents of the law are going to have a tough time in court showing the federal government's unprecedented investments in border security and manpower, as well as its massive expansion of ICE and DHS (I guess expanding the federal government is only bad when it's helping poor people instead of arresting them, huh?), represents a failure to do its job. For that matter, are we prepared for the massive spending and police-state procedures that would be necessary to completely and fully seal off the border? It seems like those concerned about our economic condition would be leery about so much deficit spending to do such a thing.

In fact, for all this talk about America not being able to afford to have these people here, no one has yet put forth a single piece of evidence that illegal immigration has a net negative economic effect. It's simply assumed to be true, despite the fact that independent, nonpartisan studies show they tend to have a net zero effect on the economy. So what would be worse? Keeping people here who have no net effect on the economy, or spending billions upon billions of dollars to deport them? Also, even with all their problems, Greece is still not a third-world country, and we are nowhere near a Greece situation. Not even close.

[EDIT because I know someone will challenge me on that last statement: http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/0 ... we-greece/. Here's the upshot: By 2015, our deficit is projected to be about 4 percent of GDP. Greece's, had they not undertaken any austerity measures, would have been 14 percent of GDP. Our total debt as a percentage of GDP is currently half of Greece's. No argument that we need to bring the deficit back under control, but we aren't close to Greece, and we aren't remotely close to becoming a third-world country.]

Also, I'll say this again, and I'll keep saying it until it sticks: The number of illegal immigrants in this country is going down, not up. That means more people are leaving than coming. So, I'll ask again because no one's actually answered it: Why does Arizona need this law now? Besides to prop up Jan Brewer's previously sagging re-election campaign, of course.

Daniel's comments on exe's church are about the most un-Christian thing I've seen on these boards. Truly disgusting.

I said "media" is a plural word not to nitpick on grammar but to point out that "the media" are a collection of local, statewide and nationwide entities in print, on TV and on radio. Each of these entities employs several, dozens or even hundreds of reporters who produce the words you read, see or hear every day. In other words, there is no "liberal media" because all these people, the vast majority of whom are dedicated to being objective, cannot speak with one political voice, even if they wanted to. The notion of "the liberal media" happens to be propagated by the very people who stand to benefit financially from conservatives believing that canard: the radio and cable screamers on the right. But I'm sure that's just a coincidence. Just like I'm sure it's just a coincidence that all the arguments I'm hearing in this debate seem to be taken straight from the lips of these men and women, who have made a lot of money scaring a lot of good people into believing the half-truths and outright fantasies they sell on a daily basis.
0 x
- Paul

A little disoriented. Getting reoriented.

User avatar
Dan
Pethead Fanatic
Pethead Fanatic
Posts: 2556
Joined: Thu Oct 09, 2003 4:17 am
#1 Album: This Means War!
Pethead since: 1987
Location: USA
x 82

Re: SB 1070

Post by Dan » Wed Aug 04, 2010 2:27 pm

Didn't mean to offended anyone, just commenting on the stats. I guess I will sit back and shut-up. like all the other outspoken people in the past on this board.. was a nice ride.
0 x

gman
Pethead Fanatic
Pethead Fanatic
Posts: 1111
Joined: Thu Oct 02, 2003 10:03 am
Location: Used to be Grand Rapids, MI after leaving the beautiful beaches of NJ. Now it's PA.
x 32
Contact:

Re: SB 1070

Post by gman » Wed Aug 04, 2010 2:33 pm

Well some would argue that if there isn't a liberal media, or at least a large number of people in mainstream media that allow their liberal leaning views to cloud their reporting, then how on God's green earth did President Obama get elected? Would an objective media not have reported on all his questionable friends and associations? He's got a book titled Dreams of my father, or something like that, and the dreams of his father were communist. I didn't hear that anywhere.

Sure local media outlets are independent, but when many in the national media are all saying the exact same thing at the same time, and using the exact same phrases, that makes one go hmm.
0 x

User avatar
Jonathan
Official Petrazone Spokesman.
Official Petrazone Spokesman.
Posts: 1840
Joined: Fri Oct 17, 2003 5:04 am
#1 Album: More Power To Ya
Pethead since: 1991
Location: Michigansk, U.S.S.A
x 16
Contact:

Re: SB 1070

Post by Jonathan » Wed Aug 04, 2010 6:08 pm

American presidents are chosen, not elected. At least not elected in the sense we are led to believe.
0 x
"...We bent our backs and pulled the oars to the beat of Louie's solo..."

User avatar
p-freak
Pethead Fanatic
Pethead Fanatic
Posts: 1549
Joined: Thu Oct 02, 2003 10:01 am
#1 Album: Unseen Power
Pethead since: 1992
Location: The Netherlands
x 68
Contact:

Re: SB 1070

Post by p-freak » Thu Aug 05, 2010 1:02 am

gman wrote:Well some would argue that if there isn't a liberal media, or at least a large number of people in mainstream media that allow their liberal leaning views to cloud their reporting, then how on God's green earth did President Obama get elected? Would an objective media not have reported on all his questionable friends and associations? He's got a book titled Dreams of my father, or something like that, and the dreams of his father were communist. I didn't hear that anywhere.

Sure local media outlets are independent, but when many in the national media are all saying the exact same thing at the same time, and using the exact same phrases, that makes one go hmm.
I know there's a dichotomy between Republicans and Democrates in the US. But I don't understand why it always goes so deep. On this board it seems there are mainly Republicans (I don't know about this discussion, just skimmed it). What bothers me a bit is that I don't see lots of appreciation for each other. It's not just this thread, it's a general feeling I get, so maybe I'm totally wrong here. But it seems like both camps immediately jump to conclusions and hide themselves behind big words that don't really mean anything. I mean liberals and commies and media that's been heavily influenced and supposedly even dictating whatever's happening in the country. Yeah, I know, I've also seen some of Michael Moore's stuff and I'm probably a big liberal for it, but still, why does it seem impossible to respect each other's position and have a decent discussion based on mutual respect.

Anyway, this is not meant to start a big debate. Just on a side note. And I'm not criticizing gman here. It's just because the word communist sparked this idea in my mind.
0 x
Image

User avatar
separateunion
Pethead Fanatic
Pethead Fanatic
Posts: 1297
Joined: Wed Oct 01, 2003 4:20 pm
Location: Char's House
Contact:

Re: SB 1070

Post by separateunion » Thu Aug 05, 2010 1:05 am

Jonathan wrote:American presidents are chosen, not elected. At least not elected in the sense we are led to believe.
If you're spouting conspiracy theories, you'd get along well with my dad.

I'm actually pretty amazed that this is the first political discussion that involved sane posts that weren't written by myself or RJ.

I've been away for 5 days and just got to this thread, so I had to skim in sections to catch up. Forgive me if this has been discussed, but I think it's important to point out that not only do illegals perform jobs that most Americans would refuse to perform, but they also take jobs that are EXTREMELY dangerous and unsanitary, not to mention illegal by federal standards. These are some of the jobs that seriously drop the price of goods and items that are sold. I find it ironic that people are complaining about those dirty illegals and the "liberal media" that refuses to report anything conservative, yet those same people are willing to turn a blind eye to the unsafe practices that employers have illegals perform. I guess the size of government and legality of actions only matter insomuch as it lines up with your political agenda.
0 x
"Daylight, save me..."

User avatar
separateunion
Pethead Fanatic
Pethead Fanatic
Posts: 1297
Joined: Wed Oct 01, 2003 4:20 pm
Location: Char's House
Contact:

Re: SB 1070

Post by separateunion » Thu Aug 05, 2010 1:09 am

p-freak wrote:
gman wrote:Well some would argue that if there isn't a liberal media, or at least a large number of people in mainstream media that allow their liberal leaning views to cloud their reporting, then how on God's green earth did President Obama get elected? Would an objective media not have reported on all his questionable friends and associations? He's got a book titled Dreams of my father, or something like that, and the dreams of his father were communist. I didn't hear that anywhere.

Sure local media outlets are independent, but when many in the national media are all saying the exact same thing at the same time, and using the exact same phrases, that makes one go hmm.
I know there's a dichotomy between Republicans and Democrates in the US. But I don't understand why it always goes so deep. On this board it seems there are mainly Republicans (I don't know about this discussion, just skimmed it). What bothers me a bit is that I don't see lots of appreciation for each other. It's not just this thread, it's a general feeling I get, so maybe I'm totally wrong here. But it seems like both camps immediately jump to conclusions and hide themselves behind big words that don't really mean anything. I mean liberals and commies and media that's been heavily influenced and supposedly even dictating whatever's happening in the country. Yeah, I know, I've also seen some of Michael Moore's stuff and I'm probably a big liberal for it, but still, why does it seem impossible to respect each other's position and have a decent discussion based on mutual respect.

Anyway, this is not meant to start a big debate. Just on a side note. And I'm not criticizing gman here. It's just because the word communist sparked this idea in my mind.
It's easier to create broadly sweeping labels and apply them to massive amounts of people because there is less thinking involved that way. I can't call myself a Republican or a conservative, EVEN THOUGH I line up with many of their views, because I immediately get other views attributed to me that I don't agree with. It's just one of those faults of mankind that we feel the need to put people in a box so that we can judge them based on a stereotype we've, usually falsely, created.
0 x
"Daylight, save me..."

User avatar
zak89
Pethead
Pethead
Posts: 240
Joined: Wed Jul 21, 2010 6:16 pm
#1 Album: Petra Praise 2
Pethead since: 2002
x 16

Re: SB 1070

Post by zak89 » Thu Aug 05, 2010 6:27 am

I find it ironic that people are complaining about those dirty illegals and the "liberal media" that refuses to report anything conservative, yet those same people are willing to turn a blind eye to the unsafe practices that employers have illegals perform
In my experience, most conservatives are very willing to crack down on employers hiring illegals. In fact, e-verify and other methods of employer-driven checking of immigration status is quite popular among 'anti-illegals'. Of course, that'll never happen, because as wise Rep Stark says, such methods might discriminate against illegals getting a job. Wouldn't want that to happen.
And not just people, but God too! To suggest God is above both political parties, and that neither have God in the back pocket, is borderline blasphemy around here.
I trust you didn't read the exchange between Manny and I on pages 3-5 of this thread? I've been arguing this all along. If that be blasphemy, then make the most of it.

Code: Select all

If you're spouting conspiracy theories, you'd get along well with my dad.
I trust that this isn't derogatory in any way of your parents. I don't know your situation, but in my case, my parents have been around longer than the I, have more experience, and are in general wiser and more discerning than I am. And of course, somewhere in the Bible it talks about honoring parents, IIRC.
0 x

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 43 guests