Which Ten Commandments

A place for Petra fans to discuss other topics
Post Reply

Whats the deal with the second set of ten commandments?

I guess I don't know.
0
No votes
The Old Testament doesn't mean anything, Jon. Not sure if you knew that.
1
33%
There's a second (different) set?
1
33%
Oh, no. The atheists are right. I guess its back to nihilism for me.
1
33%
 
Total votes: 3

User avatar
Jonathan
Official Petrazone Spokesman.
Official Petrazone Spokesman.
Posts: 1840
Joined: Fri Oct 17, 2003 5:04 am
#1 Album: More Power To Ya
Pethead since: 1991
Location: Michigansk, U.S.S.A
x 16
Contact:

Which Ten Commandments

Post by Jonathan » Mon Jan 14, 2008 10:17 pm

So, I just got done reading Exodus 34, and there God gives Moses a second set of ten commandments. They are wholly different from the first set given in Exodus 20.

It's quite possible its just too late at night, and I don't wish to ponder this too deeply anymore. But I am curious as to your thoughts.

I have a couple theories, one being that Moses just wrote the first ten on the tablets anyway, and was merely to verbally deliver this second set to the Israelites. The second being that I don't know Hebrew. The second is that maybe Moses wrote the whole lot of commands from Exodus 20 on the tablets, and God broke it down a little bit, and had Moses write down the highlights the second time.

Online searching leads me to misguided and generally poorly thought out atheist sites.

Too simple? Probably.
0 x
"...We bent our backs and pulled the oars to the beat of Louie's solo..."

brent
Extreme Pethead Fanatic
Extreme Pethead Fanatic
Posts: 4305
Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2004 8:06 am
x 148

Post by brent » Tue Jan 15, 2008 8:20 pm

The first commands were on the stones (the Testimony) with additional commands re: the law in the Book of the Covenent.

In 34, God told Moses to make the tablets, but GOD wrote what was on the first set according to verse 1.
0 x

User avatar
charl
Pethead Fanatic
Pethead Fanatic
Posts: 735
Joined: Thu Sep 09, 2004 12:05 pm
Location: Saskatchewan Canada
x 1
Contact:

Post by charl » Wed Jan 16, 2008 8:33 am

Not that I've given it a huge amount of thought (since I am usually preoccupied with the preceding section admittedly) but I always figured he re-wrote the ten on the tablets in addition to writing these other commands in the law. The ten were an encapsulation of the whole of the law and treaty anyway.
0 x
[url=http://www.picturetrail.com/char000]CIP[/url] -slowly but steadily coming along... [img]http://www.planetsmilies.com/smilies/party/party0011.gif[/img]

User avatar
Jonathan
Official Petrazone Spokesman.
Official Petrazone Spokesman.
Posts: 1840
Joined: Fri Oct 17, 2003 5:04 am
#1 Album: More Power To Ya
Pethead since: 1991
Location: Michigansk, U.S.S.A
x 16
Contact:

Post by Jonathan » Wed Jan 16, 2008 8:46 pm

That's kind of what I figured. That there was more written on the tablets than just the big ten, or there was some kind of re-emphasis, and it just wasn't specifically recorded in the Bible what exactly was written. The minutia isn't the point. The commands were the point.
charl wrote:I am usually preoccupied with the preceding section
"
0 x
"...We bent our backs and pulled the oars to the beat of Louie's solo..."

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 21 guests